A doctor performs circumcision on a young South Sudanese refugee boy at the Ocea health centre on July 31, 2017 at a refugee camp near Arua in northwestern Uganda. (Photo by ISAAC KASAMANI / AFP) (AFP / Isaac Kasamani)

No evidence that circumcised men face likely death 10 years after procedure

  • This article is more than one year old.
  • Published on July 17, 2020 at 13:40
  • Updated on July 17, 2020 at 14:57
  • 3 min read
  • By Adeng MAYIK, AFP Kenya
A Facebook post shared thousands of times claims that circumcised men are likely to die within 10 years of the procedure because of the medication they receive. However, the post cites a report from an NGO that does not exist and experts say there is no scientific evidence that male circumcision leads to an early death.

The post claims that research carried out by an American NGO has concluded that men are likely to die after “cutting the foreskin of their manhood” due to a medication that “reacts after 10 years”. 

It was first published on a Facebook page called Malawian Eye on August 20, 2018, and began circulating again recently in Africa. The claim is that an NGO named “Deltas Clare” or “Delta Clare” -- two different spellings are used -- has written a report proving that the West has pumped billions of dollars into campaigns for circumcision in Africa with the intention of “wiping out the black race”.

Image
Screenshot of the misleading Facebook post, taken on July 15, 2020

The same claim was found on online news sites such as Uganda Spy, the Zambian Observer and The Independent Observer Zambia.

The post also claims that the report was published on the WikiLeaks website.

A non-existent report from a non-existent NGO

However, a search on the WikiLeaks database does not return any results for either “Deltas Clare” or “Deltas Clare”. In fact, there is no sign of any such organisation anywhere online. A Google search for the non-existent NGOs purported name(s) reveals several fact-checking articles, including one by Malawi24 that debunked the circumcision claim after it first emerged back in 2018.

Collins Boakye, a spokesman for the World Health Organization (WHO) regional office in Africa, told AFP Fact Check that the information in the post is false.

“There is no such organisation called Delta Clare,” he said, adding that the purported report cited in the post was nowhere to be found.  “If such a study and evidence exists and is made available, WHO would review it as per normal processes.”

No specific medicine

Dr. John Chol, a surgeon at Juba Teaching Hospital and a lecturer at the University of Juba, South Sudan, told AFP Fact Check there is no special medication used for circumcision. 

“Circumcision is a simple surgical procedure. Sometimes we use a pain killer and a simple antibiotic,” he said. 

He added that many men from different age groups get circumcised and they do not experience early deaths. “Here, in South Sudan, many were circumcised after getting married, and yet after their circumcision, they are still alive for more than ten years.” 

Dr. Odion Aire, a urologist at The Urology Hospital in South Africa, told AFP Fact Check that he was not aware of any medication specifically associated with circumcision.

“I have not heard anything about any form of medication associated with circumcision, even between the cultural/traditional circumcision and the medical circumcision, that is of any potential danger to [life].”

However, he says traditional circumcisions conducted outside of medical settings, which are common practice in many countries across Africa, are linked to an increased risk of death. 

“It's difficult to know the exact causes but the identified belief right now is sepsis -- an infection from a surgical procedure which was done under septic circumstances that led to the introduction of organisms or infection into the bloodstream of the patient,” he said.

If someone died during a circumcision carried out in a medical setting, Aire said it would be “more likely to be related to the anaesthetic or anaesthetic complications, which by itself is exceedingly rare and would be classified as a medical freak accident”.

He cautions that sharing false information is dangerous because “in doing so it's actually preventing a very simple procedure which has maximum benefits in terms of the fight against HIV, which is so critical in the African context”.

According to the WHO, there is evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually-acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60 percent. 

Is there content that you would like AFP to fact-check? Get in touch.

Contact us