Ballot papers for Nigeria's presidential and parliamentary elections, seen on February 23, 2019 at a polling station in Port Harcourt, southern Nigeria. (AFP / Yasuyoshi Chiba)

WARNING: Fake election results are flying thick and fast in Nigeria

  • This article is more than one year old.
  • Published on February 25, 2019 at 16:18
  • 4 min read
  • By AFP Nigeria, Mayowa TIJANI
Barely 24 hours after Nigeria’s presidential and parliamentary elections, fake results have been making the rounds on social media, as Africa’s most populous nation elects its president and federal members of parliament for the next four years.

Multiple posts which between them have more than 30,000 shares on Facebook and Twitter falsely claim that some politicians have lost elections they actually won, or that politicians who won, lost.

Other false posts purport to show the final results for particular constituencies, but inflate the numbers to make the politicians appear more popular than the real results suggest.

In Nigeria, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is the only body empowered by law to announce election results.

Parliamentary election results are announced by state returning officers at the state level, while the presidential election results for each state are announced by the same returning officers in Abuja. The elected president is declared by the INEC chairman.

EXAMPLES OF FAKE RESULTS

A post by the Facebook page Scannews, shared by more than 2,800 people, claims that Nigeria’s Senate president Bukola Saraki of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) won the parliamentary election in his senatorial district, Kwara Central.

The post had a picture of Saraki, and the caption: “Oloye Bukola Saraki Retains his seat, PDP = 211,591 APC = 82,642”. This is false; according to results released by the state collation officer in Kwara, Saraki lost the election.

Image
A screenshot taken on Feb 25, 2018 showing a false claim that Nigeria's senate president won his senatorial district

The same figures were posted by Facebook page Dailymail gist in a post which has been shared more than 2,400 times.

Meanwhile, a tweet by a political commentator and staunch supporter of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) correctly says that Saraki lost the election, but cites inaccurate numbers which give the APC candidate a larger lead over Saraki than he actually won.

Image
Screenshot taken on February 25, 2019, showing fake election results posted by Buhari supporter Ogundamisi

According to the official results released in the state, Saraki won 68,994 votes, while his opponent polled 123,808 votes to defeat the Senate president.

ATIKU WINNING, BUHARI WINNING

On Twitter, supporters of the two main parties have both been claiming victory for their respective presidential candidates.

Femi Fani-Kayode, a former minister of aviation and a prominent member of the main opposition PDP, claimed that Atiku Abubakar had defeated the incumbent President Muhammadu Buhari.

“Clearly Atiku has won hands down. He has defeated Buhari almost everywhere in the south and the north central with the exception of Kwara. He has also defeated Buhari in parts of the core north,” he wrote on his official Facebook page.

On Twitter, opposition supporter Demola Olarewaju tweeted that “Atiku has won this election and Buhari lost FCT, winning only exactly 23%”.

Supporters of President Muhammadu Buhari have also claimed victory, including his personal assistant Bashir Ahmad.

Image
A tweet by Buhari's media aide, claiming victory. Screenshot take on February 25, 2019

But as of 3:30pm on Monday, only four state results had been declared by INEC: two in the southwest, both won by Buhari, and two more in the north-central -- the capital for Atiku, and Kwara for Buhari.

HOW TO SPOT FAKE RESULTS

Who is sharing it?

To spot fake election results on social media, the first question you should to ask is: what is the political leaning of the person sharing the result? If they belong to, or support the party favoured by the result, then look for the source of their information.

What is the source?

Are the results attributed to any credible source? A newspaper? The state returning officer? Can you find multiple credible sources?

What are credible local media outlets reporting?

Credible local media outlets have many journalists on the ground and at collation centres, sending in results as they are being counted. If you see a result on social media, check in with multiple, credible local media sources. If you can see matching results on their platforms, they are likely correct.

Has INEC declared the result?

The final question to ask yourself is: what is the position of the umpire? If INEC has not announced the results publicly, they cannot be said to be officially confirmed.

Is there content that you would like AFP to fact-check? Get in touch.

Contact us